How does an AMD 64 X2 5000 dual core compare to an Intel core 2 duo?

So they're both dual cores and both 64 bit except the AMD one is 2.6 GHz while the Intel is 2.0 GHz (comparing to iMac). Which is better or more, how do I know which is better?

How does an AMD 64 X2 5000 dual core compare to an Intel core 2 duo?

AMD have a tricky way of recitation you how many actual Ghz it is. Although it is 2.6Ghz, It is a dual core. Notice that it is call a 5000+ That means that it is equal to a 5.0Ghz single core processor, which is huge. If its call a 4300, that means it is equivilant to a single core 4.3Ghz. I intuitively think AMD is agency better than intel. The main judgment is that you get plentifully more bang for your buck. Take for example the untried quad core, or dual core extreme. Dual core is like two single cores, and quad core is two dual cores, or four single cores. It be originally released by intel, and costed $1,000 dollars. But AMD is going to release a quad core, but it will be much higher and better contained by performance (they enjoy both been tested) and will cost roughly speaking $700. Its like that beside all of their processors. So dance for the AMD 5000+, because it is better than the intel one, and will most likely cost smaller quantity.
if u r looking brand name intel is best.

but if u r looking for cost thn AMD is fitting



My choice will be AMD
The AMD CPU will be faster, on average, but somewhat less than the 2.6/2.0 ratio.